Kanban vs. Scrum

Kanban vs. Scrum: A useless comparison

“Kanban vs. Scrum” is a common topic of discussion. However, comparing these two is like comparing apples to oranges. Kanban and Scrum serve different purposes and can even complement each other. This article explores the distinct roles of Kanban and Scrum, emphasizing why they should not be viewed as mutually exclusive but rather as potentially complementary components of an Agile strategy.

Scrum: A Framework for Solving Complex Problems

Scrum helps teams address complex problems while delivering high-value products. It provides a structured approach with specific roles, events, and artifacts aimed at fostering collaboration and continuous improvement. Key components of Scrum include:

  • Roles: Scrum defines three primary roles – the Product Owner, the Scrum Master, and the Development Team. Each role has distinct responsibilities to ensure effective collaboration and delivery.
  • Events: Scrum relies on time-boxed events such as Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective. These events create a rhythm for the team to plan, execute, and reflect on their work.
  • Artifacts: The primary artifacts in Scrum are the Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, and the Increment. These artifacts help maintain transparency and track progress.

Scrum operates in iterations called Sprints, typically lasting two to four weeks. During each Sprint, the team develops a potentially shippable product increment. This iterative process enables the team to respond to changes and consistently deliver value.

Kanban: A Method for Managing Workflow

Kanban focuses on visualizing work, limiting work in progress (WIP), and enhancing flow. It applies to any existing workflow, making it highly adaptable. Key principles of Kanban include:

  • Visualizing Work: Kanban boards represent the workflow visually. Teams depict tasks as cards moving through various stages of completion, providing a clear overview of the work status.
  • Limiting Work in Progress (WIP): By setting WIP limits, Kanban helps teams focus on completing tasks rather than starting new ones. This approach reduces multitasking and increases efficiency.
  • Managing Flow: Teams continuously monitor and optimize the flow of work. They aim to achieve a smooth and predictable workflow by identifying and addressing bottlenecks.

Kanban does not prescribe specific roles . This flexibility allows teams to integrate Kanban with their existing processes and gradually implement changes to improve productivity.

My free online training on managing the flow of work can help you onboard fast, understand some major Kanban concepts. You may also want to read more about the services that I offer.

Kanban vs. Scrum: Why the Comparison Is Misleading

While it’s common to see discussions about “Scrum vs. Kanban,” this comparison is fundamentally flawed because they serve different purposes:

Nature

  • Scrum: Provides a structured approach with specific roles, events, and artifacts to solve complex problems.
  • Kanban: Focuses on improving workflow and efficiency, adaptable to any existing process.

Usage Context

  • Scrum: Best suited for projects with complex, evolving requirements that benefit from regular feedback and iterative development.
  • Kanban: Ideal for teams looking to optimize their workflow, reduce bottlenecks, and enhance efficiency within any existing framework or methodology.

Integration

  • Kanban can complement a Scrum framework to manage and visualize work during Sprints. For instance, a Scrum team might use a Kanban board to track their Sprint Backlog and manage WIP limits.

Using Kanban in Scrum

Kanban can enhance Scrum’s workflow management. Here’s how Kanban can integrate into a Scrum framework:

  • Visualizing the Sprint Backlog: Teams can use a Kanban board to visualize the tasks in the Sprint Backlog, making it easier to track progress and identify bottlenecks.
  • Managing Work in Progress: By applying WIP limits, teams can ensure that they do not overcommit and can focus on completing tasks efficiently.
  • Improving Flow: Continuous monitoring and optimization of the workflow can help the team maintain a steady pace and improve overall productivity.

Integrating Kanban into your existing Scrum framework

Here are three common scenarios where Kanban can significantly improve the way Scrum works for your team and organization:

Urgent unplanned work derails your sprint

  • Picture this: you’re midway through a Sprint, and suddenly, urgent tasks pop up, threatening to derail your carefully planned iteration. This scenario is familiar to many Scrum teams. 

How Kansan helps: By incorporating Kanban, teams can create a “swimlane” dedicated to urgent tasks, allowing them to be addressed without disrupting the Sprint. This visual representation helps prioritize and manage unplanned work effectively without compromising Sprint’s goals.

Delays, dependencies and last-minute discoveries affect your plans

  • In any project, delays and dependencies can create bottlenecks, while last-minute discoveries can throw off well-laid plans. These factors can lead to sprint goals being missed and can cause frustration within the team.

How Kanban helps: By visualizing workflow stages and limiting work in progress (WIP), teams gain transparency into bottlenecks and dependencies. This insight enables them to proactively address issues, adjust priorities, and adapt plans in real-time, ensuring smoother project delivery.

High resistance to change

  • Resistance to change is a common challenge in many organizations. Teams and individuals may be hesitant to adopt new processes or methodologies, which can hinder progress and innovation.

How Kanban helps: Kanban allows teams to start with their current processes and gradually implement improvements. This approach helps in building trust and acceptance, making the transition smoother and more sustainable. 

Conclusion

“Scrum vs. Kanban” is not a battle between competing methodologies but rather a discussion of complementary tools in the Agile toolbox. Scrum provides a structured framework for tackling complex problems through iterative development and regular feedback. Kanban, on the other hand, offers a versatile method that enhances workflow management and efficiency. By understanding their unique roles and how they can work together, teams can leverage the strengths of both to achieve their goals more effectively. Whether using Scrum, Kanban, or a combination of both, the key is to align the approach with the team’s needs and the nature of the work.

Photo by NordWood Themes on Unsplash

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *